« Recognizing Career Rites of Passage | Main | Not-so-final Thoughts: A Switch in Perspective »
January 10, 2006
You’re Helping to Increase Awareness of Disability Employment Issues
Congratulations!
You’ve just completed a series of 12 "Swimming in the Mainstream" (SiM) blog discussions during calendar 2005 in which you’ve joined an average of more than 600 eSight members each month either through direct comment in writing or in non-written affirmation/disagreement.
The results?
By recounting your personal experiences in response to the various discussion topics during the year, you have collectively painted a collage of yourselves -- a picture not many people who are not involved in disability groups get to see.
The 12 insight articles which summarize your insight about each topic through direct quotes show you are:
· Adult, authentic, mobile and confident;
· Solution and inclusion oriented;
· Emotionally intelligent, technologically savvy and myth resistant.
Through monthly e-mail press releases, eSight has publicized each of these articles widely among 3,000 selected employers, career counselors and other individuals who are interested in disability employment issues. So, your observations have also reached the right people from the perspective of raising awareness about "what it’s really like" to build a career when you have a disability.
You can access each of the press releases at www.tabinc.org's press page.
There is also a link to each insight summary article on eSight’s login page under the heading, "Insights for Employers."
The new insight summary article for December, "Target Job Candidates With Disabilities Who Are Risk Takers," highlights the perceptions of SiM blog participants when they realized they were taking a calculated risk, as an adult, in a career-building situation.
We‘re highlighting that article in eSight’s Employer Resources section this week.
Before we repackage the 12 insight summary articles for further use in raising awareness among employers, career counselors and job seekers about disability employment issues from a real-world perspective, we would like to give you one last chance to add a thought which would help summarize the series.
Please consider this question:
What piece of advice for employers would you like to add as a cap to this series of "Swimming in the Mainstream" insights?
Add your comments to this posting
Posted by Jim at January 10, 2006 05:57 PM
Comments
I would like to have employers presume competence and ability in all potential employees. I would like them to share reservations or concerns if they have them but I know that each person with a disability has skills, talents and a marvelous capacity for adaptation that can serve the wonderful world of work if we are given the opportunity. If we can climb mountains, run races, compete in the paralympics and achieve graduate degrees, I suggest that our abilities to contribute are limitless. Risk taking employers are invited to respond.
Posted by: Barney Mayse at January 11, 2006 02:23 PM
To Employeres who have a genuine commitment to hiring persons with disabilities,
Train your HR recruiters and your staff well. Awareness is key to the success of both the company and the individuals involved.
Structure your hiring practices with a proactive philosophy. Hire well and offer a foundation for growth. Make sure you do not limit your commitmnet to potential employees. Include existing employees in awareness training. They will be instrumental in makeing your commitment a reality.
Train leaders to look for the potential rather than focusing on limitations.
Posted by: Helen Lee at January 11, 2006 02:40 PM
Barney and Helen have summed it up pretty well.
I think my advice would be to as an organization, from the cleaners up the ceo and cfo, go beyond your expectations, your fears, your prejudices .
ML . King said he hoped one day his children wouldn't judged on the colour of their skin but on the content of their character. I'd add that I would hope one day that all people would not be judged at all but assessed on their abilities to do the job no matter what their disability, their age, their sexual orientation, their gender, their ethnic culture, their religion or lack of it .
People really are people , we all have the same wants , the same needs, the same desires. Our children, siblings, parents, spouses , grandparents all want the same things anyone else does.
I think the best thing business needs to know when hiring a person with a disability is that it's a person first and last and that disability may make them unique in a way you'd never experience.
Hopefully we've a long way from having to hide a disability like FDR did and yet look at what he accomplished and how's he 's respected despite having polio and having to be in a wheelchair.
Posted by: Liz Seger at January 11, 2006 05:31 PM
When a disabled person sends along his/her resume it would certainly be nice to receive a reply back that someone else has been selected for the position. Why? Because it usually takes a little more time for the disabled person to get credentials, resume, and cover letter together let alone print and personally drop off, or send to the company. Even if the person isn't selected for the position it's kind of refreshing to learn that the employer did go over the material you sent.
Posted by: Len Spicak at January 11, 2006 08:57 PM
As a final cap to this series, I would ask every employer to take a minute and think about the word "disability".
You will never know our true "ability" until you give us a try
"Dis" could be the best person you could ever hire. Take the chance you take on other people. YOU WILL BE SURPRISED.
Posted by: Paul B at January 11, 2006 09:25 PM
I want to tell the employers that they shouldn't presume anything about a visually impaired interviewee before giving him/her a fair chance. Many a times, their prejudiced presumptions steal the future of the prospective visually impaired candidates.
Posted by: Anjum Taj at January 12, 2006 11:18 AM
What happens when a disabled person attempts employment, within a Union, Company?
What happens, when a enthusiastic, well intentioned, employer hires a person who is disabled, and only has certain, limited capabilities?
Since Unions, usually require that any employee must, rise within the ranks, based on attrition and openings, the disabled person, probably will not, be considered, up front.
Should the person, be hired, chances are that, the employment will not prove, to be, permanent.
The well intentioned employer hires the disabled person, for an entry level job. The person is trained, capable and becomes a trusted, reliable, and well liked worker.
As time goes on, Mr. well intentioned, sees a chance, for that deserving, disabled worker, to promote, and thus, abetter himself.
Pressure is applied on the worker, to take advantage, of this advancement, and pressure causes problems.
The worker immediately reacts, to the pressure, becomes confused, frustrated, and agitated.
The worker begins, to act out, in odd and unacceptable manners.
The great worker, becomes seen as an ingrate, and obviously does not appreciate the employers kindness and goodness. The employer is hurt and dismayed, with this behavior, and attitudinal change.
The great employee looses his job.
The great worker, looses faith in himself, looses self esteem, and very often, may loose the work skills, before he can ever become employed again.
The above rationale, is why professional job placement and subsequent follow up, is so very necessary.
C. Fred Stout
San Antonio, Texas
Posted by: C. Fred Stout at January 12, 2006 01:40 PM
Here's my word of advice for employers:
Be willing to reach compromises with your employees regarding disability accommodations. It's ok to ask questions, but you should not refuse accommodations. Here's an example: a visually impaired student taking a technical support position. The user will likely need to install a screen reader on one of the ocmputers in the workplace. In addition, he may need to put labels on the phone to know which button he is pushing. A light sensor might be necessary if the user is taking calls on a multi-line phone. Some employers might think it is ok to refuse such accommodations. This is especially ture if the employer is concerned about background noise in the office, software that is not normally installed on the computer, or being able to operate the phone. The employer can sk questions about the employee's accommodations. Some possible questions might include:
How can you access the computer without vision? How will you know which line is ringing when you answer the phone? How can you identify the buttons on the phone? You can request that the employee use a headset to listen to the screen reader in order to keep from distracting other employees. In addition, the employee might choose to turn the sound off and use a braille display. In addition, if you are having trouble accommodating the employee, let him know right up-front so he can find another workplace. Don't just hire him and then refuse to work with him just because he is visually impaired. Other users can send comments to ericp@teleport.com
Posted by: Eric Patterson at January 12, 2006 11:42 PM
I would like to touch a bit on what Eric says. I was a receptionist at a nonprofit organization for a few years. One of my duties was to answer the front-desk phone and occasionally make business-related calls. I am blind with only light perception in both eyes. The phone at the front desk had pieces of Velcro on a few buttons such as each of the staff extensions and the voicemail transfer button. This worked out quite well for me, and nobody in the organization had a problem with it. When I typed out things for the staff, I used JAWS or Window-Eyes for part of the time. However, VR was only willing to support me for part of the time. So I had to rely on a fully-sighted co-worker to dictate things for me part of the time.
Posted by: Jake Joehl at January 17, 2006 03:20 PM
Good job thanks! Best wishes to owner of this site!
Posted by: Chester at April 6, 2006 04:37 AM